Civil Procedure

  • Szabo v. Municipality of Anchorage In Szabo v. Municipality of Anchorage, In response to a complaint about a zoning violation against the Szabos, the Municipality ...
  • Sagers v. Sackinger   In Sagers v. Sackinger, the supreme court held the trial court does not abuse its discretion by refusing a request for a continuance due to illness when the court determines that the requesting party is exaggerating the severity of their symptoms and is capable of participating in the trial without serious risk to his ...
  • Rude v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc. In Rude v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc., After being removed ...
  • Hawkins v. Attatayuk In Hawkins v. Attatayuk, The couple was ...
  • Alsworth v. Seybert In Alsworth v. Seybert,  Seybert and several other registered Borough voters brought suit against Alsworth and Anelon, two members of the Borough Assembly, for violating local and state conflict ...
  • Patterson v. Cox In Patterson v. Cox, He filed suit ...
  • In re Mark V. In In re Mark V., The superior court ordered Mark ...
  • Conitz v. State, Commission for Human Rights In Conitz v. State, Commission for Human Rights, In 2006, Conitz filed complaints with both the Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (“the Commission”) and the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) for ...
  • BP Pipelines, Inc. v. State, Dep’t of Revenue In BP Pipelines, Inc. v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, Following initial trial de novo in superior ...
  • Steven v. Nicole In Steven v. Nicole, Following ...

Civil Procedure

  • Szabo v. Municipality of Anchorage In Szabo v. Municipality of Anchorage, In response to a complaint about a zoning violation against the Szabos, the Municipality ...
  • Sagers v. Sackinger   In Sagers v. Sackinger, the supreme court held the trial court does not abuse its discretion by refusing a request for a continuance due to illness when the court determines that the requesting party is exaggerating the severity of their symptoms and is capable of participating in the trial without serious risk to his ...
  • Rude v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc. In Rude v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc., After being removed ...
  • Hawkins v. Attatayuk In Hawkins v. Attatayuk, The couple was ...
  • Alsworth v. Seybert In Alsworth v. Seybert,  Seybert and several other registered Borough voters brought suit against Alsworth and Anelon, two members of the Borough Assembly, for violating local and state conflict ...
  • Patterson v. Cox In Patterson v. Cox, He filed suit ...
  • In re Mark V. In In re Mark V., The superior court ordered Mark ...
  • Conitz v. State, Commission for Human Rights In Conitz v. State, Commission for Human Rights, In 2006, Conitz filed complaints with both the Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (“the Commission”) and the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) for ...
  • BP Pipelines, Inc. v. State, Dep’t of Revenue In BP Pipelines, Inc. v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, Following initial trial de novo in superior ...
  • Steven v. Nicole In Steven v. Nicole, Following ...