Ethics and Professional Responsibility

  • In re Estelle   In In re Estelle, the supreme court held that suspension is an appropriate sanction for judges who have recklessly violated ethical duties in the code of judicial conduct. when in fact three of his cases ...
  • In re Miles   In In re Miles, Miles helped her client open two bank ...
  • McAlpine v. Priddle In McApline v. Priddle, the supreme court held that an arbitration  decision carried out under Alaska’s Revised Uniform Arbitration Act concerning an attorney’s fee dispute is only reviewable in instances of (1) fraud, (2) evident partiality by the arbitrators, (3) refusal to consider material evidence, (4) abuse of power, (5) a prior agreement not to ...
  • In re Reinstatement of Weiderholt   In In re Reinstatement of Weiderholt, The Disciplinary Board (“Board”) conditionally agreed, recommending that ...
  • In re Cummings   In In re Cummings, In April 2012, the Alaska Commission on ...

Ethics and Professional Responsibility

  • In re Estelle   In In re Estelle, the supreme court held that suspension is an appropriate sanction for judges who have recklessly violated ethical duties in the code of judicial conduct. when in fact three of his cases ...
  • In re Miles   In In re Miles, Miles helped her client open two bank ...
  • McAlpine v. Priddle In McApline v. Priddle, the supreme court held that an arbitration  decision carried out under Alaska’s Revised Uniform Arbitration Act concerning an attorney’s fee dispute is only reviewable in instances of (1) fraud, (2) evident partiality by the arbitrators, (3) refusal to consider material evidence, (4) abuse of power, (5) a prior agreement not to ...
  • In re Reinstatement of Weiderholt   In In re Reinstatement of Weiderholt, The Disciplinary Board (“Board”) conditionally agreed, recommending that ...
  • In re Cummings   In In re Cummings, In April 2012, the Alaska Commission on ...