Year In Review

Sampson v. Alaskan Airlines, Inc.

Posted on March 10th, 2021

TORT LAW Andrew Webb Sampson v. Alaskan Airlines, Inc. In Sampson v. Alaskan Airlines, Inc., 467 P.3d 1072 (Alaska 2020), the supreme court held that a special verdict form requiring proof by a “reasonable degree of certainty,” instead of the correct standard of “reasonably probable,” did not constitute plain error. (Id. at 1075). After Sampson Continue Reading »

Matter of April S.

Posted on March 10th, 2021

FAMILY LAW / NATIVE LAW Jacob Keohane   Matter of April S. In the Matter of April S., 467 P.3d 1091 (Alaska, 2020), the supreme court ruled that an out-of-state mental health professional qualified as an expert under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), given the severity of the child’s psychiatric conditions. The ICWA requires Continue Reading »

James v. Alaska Frontier Constructors, Inc.

Posted on March 10th, 2021

EMPLOYMENT LAW Christopher Dodd   James v. Alaska Frontier Constructors, Inc. In James v. Alaska Frontier Constructors, Inc., 468 P.3d 711 (Alaska 2020), the supreme court held that there was insufficient evidence to determine corporate relationships between three companies, and it was therefore inappropriate to grant summary judgement based on immunity under the Alaska Workers’ Continue Reading »

In re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Rabi R.

Posted on March 10th, 2021

HEALTH Savannah Artusi   In re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Rabi R. In In re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Rabi R., 468 P.3d 721 (Alaska 2020), the supreme court held that the lower court’s failure to order a screening investigation upon receipt of a petition for involuntary detention for psychiatric evaluation was harmless Continue Reading »

Hedrick v. State

Posted on March 10th, 2021

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Natalie Howard   Hedrick v. State In Hedrick v. State, 474 P.3d 4 (Alaska Ct. App. 2020), the court of appeals upheld a criminal defendant’s waiver of his right to a jury trial because the trial judge had adequately advised him of his right. (Id. at 5). Hunter Hedrick was charged with multiple Continue Reading »

Downing v. Country Life Insurance Company

Posted on March 10th, 2021

INSURANCE LAW Angela Sbano   Downing v. Country Life Insurance Company In Downing v. Country Life Insurance Company, 473 P.3d 699 (2020), the Supreme Court of Alaska affirmed the superior court’s decision that a mother’s interpretation of her late daughter’s life insurance policy was unreasonable, and that the insurance company had paid out the proper Continue Reading »

Chaney v. State

Posted on March 10th, 2021

ADMIRALTY LAW Kristen M. Renberg, PhD   Chaney v. State In Chaney v. States, 478 P.3d 222, (Alaska Ct. App. 2020), the court of appeals held that a defendant was properly convicted of fishing with an overlength commercial salmon seine vessel and the regulation for measuring the length of vessels adopted by the State’s Board Continue Reading »

Carr v. Alaska Bar Association

Posted on March 10th, 2021

ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Macklin Willigan   Carr v. Alaska Bar Association In Carr v. Alaska Bar Association (475 P.3d 269 (Alaska 2020)), the supreme court held that health concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic did not warrant allowing bar applicants to practice law without taking and passing the bar examination. (Id. at 269.). Seven Continue Reading »

Baker v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights

Posted on March 10th, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW EMPLOYMENT LAW Kate Goldberg   Baker v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights In Baker v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights, 476 P.3d 1120 (Alaska 2020), the supreme court held a commission’s dismissal of a discrimination complaint was not so arbitrary and capricious as to offend due process (id. at 1127) and Continue Reading »

Alleva v. Municipality of Anchorage

Posted on March 10th, 2021

CIVIL PROCEDURE Daisy Gray   Alleva v. Municipality of Anchorage In Alleva v. Municipality of Anchorage, 467 P.3d 1083 (Alaska 2020), the supreme court held that the superior court properly considered a settlement agreement that plaintiffs referenced in but did not attach to their complaint in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, and that the settlement Continue Reading »

Year In Review

Sampson v. Alaskan Airlines, Inc.

Posted on March 10th, 2021

TORT LAW Andrew Webb Sampson v. Alaskan Airlines, Inc. In Sampson v. Alaskan Airlines, Inc., 467 P.3d 1072 (Alaska 2020), the supreme court held that a special verdict form requiring proof by a “reasonable degree of certainty,” instead of the correct standard of “reasonably probable,” did not constitute plain error. (Id. at 1075). After Sampson Continue Reading »

Matter of April S.

Posted on March 10th, 2021

FAMILY LAW / NATIVE LAW Jacob Keohane   Matter of April S. In the Matter of April S., 467 P.3d 1091 (Alaska, 2020), the supreme court ruled that an out-of-state mental health professional qualified as an expert under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), given the severity of the child’s psychiatric conditions. The ICWA requires Continue Reading »

James v. Alaska Frontier Constructors, Inc.

Posted on March 10th, 2021

EMPLOYMENT LAW Christopher Dodd   James v. Alaska Frontier Constructors, Inc. In James v. Alaska Frontier Constructors, Inc., 468 P.3d 711 (Alaska 2020), the supreme court held that there was insufficient evidence to determine corporate relationships between three companies, and it was therefore inappropriate to grant summary judgement based on immunity under the Alaska Workers’ Continue Reading »

In re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Rabi R.

Posted on March 10th, 2021

HEALTH Savannah Artusi   In re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Rabi R. In In re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Rabi R., 468 P.3d 721 (Alaska 2020), the supreme court held that the lower court’s failure to order a screening investigation upon receipt of a petition for involuntary detention for psychiatric evaluation was harmless Continue Reading »

Hedrick v. State

Posted on March 10th, 2021

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Natalie Howard   Hedrick v. State In Hedrick v. State, 474 P.3d 4 (Alaska Ct. App. 2020), the court of appeals upheld a criminal defendant’s waiver of his right to a jury trial because the trial judge had adequately advised him of his right. (Id. at 5). Hunter Hedrick was charged with multiple Continue Reading »

Downing v. Country Life Insurance Company

Posted on March 10th, 2021

INSURANCE LAW Angela Sbano   Downing v. Country Life Insurance Company In Downing v. Country Life Insurance Company, 473 P.3d 699 (2020), the Supreme Court of Alaska affirmed the superior court’s decision that a mother’s interpretation of her late daughter’s life insurance policy was unreasonable, and that the insurance company had paid out the proper Continue Reading »

Chaney v. State

Posted on March 10th, 2021

ADMIRALTY LAW Kristen M. Renberg, PhD   Chaney v. State In Chaney v. States, 478 P.3d 222, (Alaska Ct. App. 2020), the court of appeals held that a defendant was properly convicted of fishing with an overlength commercial salmon seine vessel and the regulation for measuring the length of vessels adopted by the State’s Board Continue Reading »

Carr v. Alaska Bar Association

Posted on March 10th, 2021

ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Macklin Willigan   Carr v. Alaska Bar Association In Carr v. Alaska Bar Association (475 P.3d 269 (Alaska 2020)), the supreme court held that health concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic did not warrant allowing bar applicants to practice law without taking and passing the bar examination. (Id. at 269.). Seven Continue Reading »

Baker v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights

Posted on March 10th, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW EMPLOYMENT LAW Kate Goldberg   Baker v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights In Baker v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights, 476 P.3d 1120 (Alaska 2020), the supreme court held a commission’s dismissal of a discrimination complaint was not so arbitrary and capricious as to offend due process (id. at 1127) and Continue Reading »

Alleva v. Municipality of Anchorage

Posted on March 10th, 2021

CIVIL PROCEDURE Daisy Gray   Alleva v. Municipality of Anchorage In Alleva v. Municipality of Anchorage, 467 P.3d 1083 (Alaska 2020), the supreme court held that the superior court properly considered a settlement agreement that plaintiffs referenced in but did not attach to their complaint in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, and that the settlement Continue Reading »