Main Menu

Native Law

  • Native Village of Chignik Lagoon v. State, Department of Health & Social Services
    NATIVE LAWSupreme Court of Alaska (2022)Sarah CouillardIn Native Village of Chignik Lagoon v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, 518 P.3d708 (Alaska 2022), the supreme court held that a child’s tribe for the purposes of the IndianChild Welfare Act (ICWA) is either a tribe of which the child is a member, or a tribe ...
  • Southcentral Foundation v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
    NATIVE LAWUnited States District Court, District of Alaska (2022)Kristiana OlsonIn Southcentral Foundation v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, 2022 WL 2834283 (D.Alaska 2022), the district court held that a tribal healthcare organization was entitled to privilegeddocuments relating to its governance and participation rights in Alaska Native Tribal HealthConsortium (ANTHC). (Id. at *14). ANTHC is a ...
  • State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Cissy A.
    NATIVE LAWSupreme Court of Alaska (2022)Sam MacDuffieIn State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Cissy A., 513 P.3d 999 (Alaska 2022), thesupreme court found that although the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) does not require culturalexpert testimony in every case, the lower court did not err by finding specific cultural testimonyinsufficient in two cases. ...
  • Mona J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services
    NATIVE LAW/FAMILY LAW Supreme Court of Alaska (2022) Robert Bulka In Mona J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, 511 P.3d 553 (Alaska 2022), the supreme court held that while a lack of parental cooperation with the Office of Children’s Services (OCS) does not justify making only passive efforts to provide remedial services to prevent Native ...
  • Metlakatla Indian Community v. Dunleavy
    NATIVE LAW United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (2022) Connor Sakati In Metlakatla Indian Community v. Dunleavy, 48 F.4th 963 (9th Cir. 2022), the Ninth Circuit held that Alaskan fishing regulations limiting fishers from entering a fishery are inapplicable to the Metlakatla Indian Community, because these regulations would violate the community’s right to fish traditional off-reservation fishing grounds. ...
  • Scudero v. State
    NATIVE LAW Emma Giusto In Scudero v. State, 496 P.3d 381 (Alaska 2021), the supreme court held that an Alaska Native’s fishing rights did not exempt him from the State’s fishing regulations. (Id. at 383). Scudero, a member of the Metlakatla Indian Community, was charged with not having a fishing permit, fishing in closed waters, and unlawful ...
  • Ahtna, Inc. v. Department of Natural Resources
    NATIVE LAW Emma Giusto In Ahtna, Inc. v. Department of Natural Resources, 2021 Alas. LEXIS 26 (Alaska, Mar. 12, 2021), the supreme court held that (1) the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1601–1629h extinguished aboriginal title and retroactively validated the State’s right of way over Native land, and (2) the right of way ...
  • Walker E. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children’s Services
    NATIVE LAW, FAMILY LAW Mary Beth Barksdale In Walker E. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services., Office of Children’s Services, 480 P.3d 598, 607 (Alaska 2021), the supreme court upheld the termination of parental rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) and AS 47.10 where the Office of Children’s Services (OCS) had made sufficient ...
  • Clark J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children’s Services
    NATIVE LAW, FAMILY LAW Mary Beth Barksdale In Clark J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children’s Services, 483 P.3d 896 (Alaska 2021), the supreme court reversed the Superior Court’s termination of parental rights, finding clear error where the Office of Children’s Services (OCS) had failed to make active efforts to reunite Indian ...
  • Peidlow v. Williams
    NATIVE LAW Kristen M. Renberg, Ph.D. In Peidlow v. Williams,1the supreme court held that the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) requires a superior court that receives a tribal court order to first determine whether the order was issued in an ICWA child custody proceeding, and if it was, to follow the full faith and credit mandate of ...

Native Law

  • Native Village of Chignik Lagoon v. State, Department of Health & Social Services
    NATIVE LAWSupreme Court of Alaska (2022)Sarah CouillardIn Native Village of Chignik Lagoon v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, 518 P.3d708 (Alaska 2022), the supreme court held that a child’s tribe for the purposes of the IndianChild Welfare Act (ICWA) is either a tribe of which the child is a member, or a tribe ...
  • Southcentral Foundation v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
    NATIVE LAWUnited States District Court, District of Alaska (2022)Kristiana OlsonIn Southcentral Foundation v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, 2022 WL 2834283 (D.Alaska 2022), the district court held that a tribal healthcare organization was entitled to privilegeddocuments relating to its governance and participation rights in Alaska Native Tribal HealthConsortium (ANTHC). (Id. at *14). ANTHC is a ...
  • State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Cissy A.
    NATIVE LAWSupreme Court of Alaska (2022)Sam MacDuffieIn State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Cissy A., 513 P.3d 999 (Alaska 2022), thesupreme court found that although the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) does not require culturalexpert testimony in every case, the lower court did not err by finding specific cultural testimonyinsufficient in two cases. ...
  • Mona J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services
    NATIVE LAW/FAMILY LAW Supreme Court of Alaska (2022) Robert Bulka In Mona J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, 511 P.3d 553 (Alaska 2022), the supreme court held that while a lack of parental cooperation with the Office of Children’s Services (OCS) does not justify making only passive efforts to provide remedial services to prevent Native ...
  • Metlakatla Indian Community v. Dunleavy
    NATIVE LAW United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (2022) Connor Sakati In Metlakatla Indian Community v. Dunleavy, 48 F.4th 963 (9th Cir. 2022), the Ninth Circuit held that Alaskan fishing regulations limiting fishers from entering a fishery are inapplicable to the Metlakatla Indian Community, because these regulations would violate the community’s right to fish traditional off-reservation fishing grounds. ...
  • Scudero v. State
    NATIVE LAW Emma Giusto In Scudero v. State, 496 P.3d 381 (Alaska 2021), the supreme court held that an Alaska Native’s fishing rights did not exempt him from the State’s fishing regulations. (Id. at 383). Scudero, a member of the Metlakatla Indian Community, was charged with not having a fishing permit, fishing in closed waters, and unlawful ...
  • Ahtna, Inc. v. Department of Natural Resources
    NATIVE LAW Emma Giusto In Ahtna, Inc. v. Department of Natural Resources, 2021 Alas. LEXIS 26 (Alaska, Mar. 12, 2021), the supreme court held that (1) the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1601–1629h extinguished aboriginal title and retroactively validated the State’s right of way over Native land, and (2) the right of way ...
  • Walker E. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children’s Services
    NATIVE LAW, FAMILY LAW Mary Beth Barksdale In Walker E. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services., Office of Children’s Services, 480 P.3d 598, 607 (Alaska 2021), the supreme court upheld the termination of parental rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) and AS 47.10 where the Office of Children’s Services (OCS) had made sufficient ...
  • Clark J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children’s Services
    NATIVE LAW, FAMILY LAW Mary Beth Barksdale In Clark J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children’s Services, 483 P.3d 896 (Alaska 2021), the supreme court reversed the Superior Court’s termination of parental rights, finding clear error where the Office of Children’s Services (OCS) had failed to make active efforts to reunite Indian ...
  • Peidlow v. Williams
    NATIVE LAW Kristen M. Renberg, Ph.D. In Peidlow v. Williams,1the supreme court held that the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) requires a superior court that receives a tribal court order to first determine whether the order was issued in an ICWA child custody proceeding, and if it was, to follow the full faith and credit mandate of ...