Criminal Procedure

Torrence v. State, Department of Corrections

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Supreme Court of Alaska (2022) Elza Bouhassira In Torrence v. State, Department of Corrections, 2022 WL 2093196 (Alaska 2022) (unpublished), the supreme court held that a court may dismiss an appeal if an inmate has failed to exhaust the available administrative remedies. (Id. at *1). A riot broke out at Spring Creek Correctional Continue Reading »

Zurlo v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Connor Sakati In Zurlo v. State, 506 P.3d 777 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the Court of Appeals held that, when a prosecutor violates the duty of making a “reasonably complete and fair” presentation to a grand jury, the prosecutor then “subvert[s] the integrity” of that grand jury, so Continue Reading »

Mosquito v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Scott Anderson In Mosquito v. State, 504 P.3d 918 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the court of appeals held that a parole compliance law only applied to compliance on or after the law took effect. (Id. at 922–23). The legislature amended the initial version of a law which Continue Reading »

Victor v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Sam MacDuffie In Victor v. State, 516 P.3d 506 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the court of appeals held that the State is not required to show a criminal defendant is competent before re-instating charges which were previously dismissed without prejudice because of a finding that the defendant Continue Reading »

Strong v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Flora Lipsky In Strong v. State, 508 P.3d 1127 (Alaska App. 2022), the court of appeals held that risk of harm to property can constitute a “significant evil” when establishing a common law defense of necessity in a criminal case. (Id. at 1132). A fishing boat with Continue Reading »

Gomez v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW & CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Alex Bartlow In Gomez v. State, 516 P.3d 879 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the court of appeals held that (1) statements made by a victim during the initial portion of a 911 call were not testimonial in nature, so their admission at trial did Continue Reading »

Whisenhunt v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Rachel Reiss In Whisenhunt v. State, 504 P.3d 268 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the court of appeals held that its standard for remanding a case to a trial court to reconsider a criminal defendant’s motion for a new trial was not a new rule. (Id. at 270). Continue Reading »

Riley v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Jake Sherman In Riley v. State, 515 P.3d 1259 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the Alaska Court of Appeals held that the superior court prejudiced a criminal defendant by modifying its jury instructions after closing arguments without a compelling reason, after the defendant had relied on the prior Continue Reading »

Hinshaw v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Sam MacDuffie In Hinshaw v. State, 515 P.3d 129 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the court of appeals held that a criminal defendant must be allowed to knowingly and intelligently waive his or her right to counsel for any reason, regardless of the trial court’s own opinion. (Id. Continue Reading »

Burton-Hill v. State

Posted on May 8th, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Sasha Kahn In Burton-Hill v. State, 500 P.3d 1016 (Alaska Ct. App. 2021), the court of appeals held that in order to prevent a miscarriage of justice, an appellate court has the authority to request supplemental briefing, and effectively used that authority in requesting supplemental briefs regarding the definitions of terms and phrases Continue Reading »

Criminal Procedure

Torrence v. State, Department of Corrections

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Supreme Court of Alaska (2022) Elza Bouhassira In Torrence v. State, Department of Corrections, 2022 WL 2093196 (Alaska 2022) (unpublished), the supreme court held that a court may dismiss an appeal if an inmate has failed to exhaust the available administrative remedies. (Id. at *1). A riot broke out at Spring Creek Correctional Continue Reading »

Zurlo v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Connor Sakati In Zurlo v. State, 506 P.3d 777 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the Court of Appeals held that, when a prosecutor violates the duty of making a “reasonably complete and fair” presentation to a grand jury, the prosecutor then “subvert[s] the integrity” of that grand jury, so Continue Reading »

Mosquito v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Scott Anderson In Mosquito v. State, 504 P.3d 918 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the court of appeals held that a parole compliance law only applied to compliance on or after the law took effect. (Id. at 922–23). The legislature amended the initial version of a law which Continue Reading »

Victor v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Sam MacDuffie In Victor v. State, 516 P.3d 506 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the court of appeals held that the State is not required to show a criminal defendant is competent before re-instating charges which were previously dismissed without prejudice because of a finding that the defendant Continue Reading »

Strong v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Flora Lipsky In Strong v. State, 508 P.3d 1127 (Alaska App. 2022), the court of appeals held that risk of harm to property can constitute a “significant evil” when establishing a common law defense of necessity in a criminal case. (Id. at 1132). A fishing boat with Continue Reading »

Gomez v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW & CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Alex Bartlow In Gomez v. State, 516 P.3d 879 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the court of appeals held that (1) statements made by a victim during the initial portion of a 911 call were not testimonial in nature, so their admission at trial did Continue Reading »

Whisenhunt v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Rachel Reiss In Whisenhunt v. State, 504 P.3d 268 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the court of appeals held that its standard for remanding a case to a trial court to reconsider a criminal defendant’s motion for a new trial was not a new rule. (Id. at 270). Continue Reading »

Riley v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Jake Sherman In Riley v. State, 515 P.3d 1259 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the Alaska Court of Appeals held that the superior court prejudiced a criminal defendant by modifying its jury instructions after closing arguments without a compelling reason, after the defendant had relied on the prior Continue Reading »

Hinshaw v. State

Posted on December 21st, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Court of Appeals of Alaska (2022) Sam MacDuffie In Hinshaw v. State, 515 P.3d 129 (Alaska Ct. App. 2022), the court of appeals held that a criminal defendant must be allowed to knowingly and intelligently waive his or her right to counsel for any reason, regardless of the trial court’s own opinion. (Id. Continue Reading »

Burton-Hill v. State

Posted on May 8th, 2022

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Sasha Kahn In Burton-Hill v. State, 500 P.3d 1016 (Alaska Ct. App. 2021), the court of appeals held that in order to prevent a miscarriage of justice, an appellate court has the authority to request supplemental briefing, and effectively used that authority in requesting supplemental briefs regarding the definitions of terms and phrases Continue Reading »